This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by KINCAID, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

From Cooperative to Coercive Federalism

Cooperative federalism, the reigning conception of American federalism from about 1954 to 1978, was a political response to the policy challenges of market failure, postwar affluence, racism, urban poverty, environmentalism, and individual rights. Having social equity as its primary objective, cooperative federalism significantly transformed American society, but when the conditions underlying cooperation changed during the 1970s, the pressure to expand national power inherent in cooperative federalism gave rise to coercive federalism, in which the federal government reduced its reliance on fiscal tools to stimulate intergovernmental policy cooperation and increased its reliance on regulatory tools to ensure the supremacy of federal policy. The erosion of federal fiscal power and of constitutional and political limits on federal regulatory power in the 1970s and 1980s has produced a more coercive system of federal preemptions of state and local authority and unfunded mandates on state and local governments. This system undermines governmental responsibility and public accountability; yet state and local governments may not possess sufficient constitutional or political leverage to alter the system. Thus cooperative federalism has not been replaced by a new consensus on federalism. In light of contemporary conditions, a new consensus may have to be forged from elements of cooperative equity, competitive efficiency, and dual accountability.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 509, No. 1, 139-152 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716290509001013


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Mendez and M. Mendez Comparing Privacy Regimes: Federal Theory and the Politics of Privacy Regulation in the European Union and the United States Publius, October 30, 2009; (2009) pjp031v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. S. Weissert, C. W. Stenberg, and R. L. Cole Continuity and Change: A Ranking of Key Issues Affecting U.S. Intergovernmental Relations (1995-2005) Publius, September 1, 2009; 39(4): 677 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Regan and C. J. Deering State Opposition to REAL ID Publius, June 1, 2009; 39(3): 476 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Birkland and S. Waterman Is Federalism the Reason for Policy Failure in Hurricane Katrina? Publius, September 1, 2008; 38(4): 692 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Posner The Politics of Coercive Federalism in the Bush Era Publius, May 23, 2007; (2007) pjm014v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Zimmerman Congressional Preemption During the George W. Bush Administration Publius, April 25, 2007; (2007) pjm008v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Krane The Middle Tier in American Federalism: State Government Policy Activism During The Bush Presidency Publius, April 12, 2007; (2007) pjm006v1. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Provost The Politics of Consumer Protection: Explaining State Attorney General Participation in Multi-State Lawsuits Political Research Quarterly, December 1, 2006; 59(4): 609 - 618. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. T. Gormley Jr. Money and Mandates: The Politics of Intergovernmental Conflict Publius, January 1, 2006; 36(4): 523 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. McCurdy Political Culture, Local Government and Progressive Personnel Practices: The Case of Collective Bargaining Provisions and a Test of Elazar's and Lieske's Measures of Political Culture Review of Public Personnel Administration, January 1, 1998; 18(1): 23 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]