This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Amr, H. Articles by Singer, P. W. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

To Win the "War on Terror," We Must First Win the "War of Ideas": Here's How

P. W. Singer

This article addresses the critical role that public diplomacy plays in improving the deteriorating image of the United States in the Muslim world. The authors argue that both public diplomacy and policies, including those on civil liberties, are vital to U.S. success in the war on terrorism and that the next U.S. president must designate this effort as a matter of highest national security importance. Many in the Muslim world believe that the war on terrorism is essentially a war on Islam; this view impedes the success of an effective foreign policy strategy. Previous efforts of public diplomacy have lacked funding, energy, focus, and an integrated strategy. The authors define six principles to improve America's security through winning the war of ideas, including addressing civil liberties concerns, and engaging diverse constituencies in the Muslim world. Finally, the authors describe ten public diplomacy initiatives to improve U.S.–Muslim world relations.

Key Words: public diplomacy • U.S. foreign policy • war on terror • Muslim world • national security

References

• Amr, Hady. 2005. American public diplomacy: Some lessons from Germany. The Daily Star (Lebanon), July 15. http://www.spinwatch.org/content/view/1475/9/.
• Amr, Hady, and Steven Barnes. 2007. How to advance U.S. public diplomacy. The Daily Star (Lebanon), September 3. http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2007/0903diplomacy_amr.aspx.
• Cohen, Eliot A. 2001. World War IV. Wall Street Journal, November 20. http://opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=95001493.
• Cook, Stephen. 2004. Hearts, minds and hearings. New York Times, July 6. http://www.cfr.org/publication/7168/hearts_minds_and_hearings.html.
• Huntington, Samuel. 1998. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Li Cunxin. 2003. Mao's last dancer. Berkeley, CA: Berkley Publishing Group.
• McMillan, Joseph. 2006. In the same light as slavery: Building a global antiterrorist consensus. Institute for National Strategic Studies, December. Washington, DC: National Defense University press. http://www.ndu.edu/inss/books/2007/gate.pdf.
• Paden, John N., and P.W. Singer. 2003. America slams the door (on its foot). Foreign Affairs, June. http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20030501facomment11216/john-n-paden-peter-w-singer/america-slams-the-door-on-its-foot-washington-s-destructive-new-visa-policies.html.
• Pew Global Attitudes Project. 2005. American character gets mixed reviews: U.S. image up slightly, but still negative. Pew Research Center, June 23. http://pewglobal.org/reports/pdf/247.pdf.
• ---. 2006. America's image slips, but allies share U.S. concerns over Iran, Hamas. Pew Research Center, June 13. http://pewglobal.org/reports/display.php?ReportID=252.
• Singer, P.W. 2007. America goodwill, in shackles. Salon.com, June 26. http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2007/06/26/war_of_ideas/.
• Telhami, Shibley. 2007. 2006 annual Arab public opinion survey. February. College Park: University of Maryland, Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development.
• U.S. Department of Defense. 2004. Final report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Strategic Communication. September. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
• U.S. Department of State. 2005. Cultural diplomacy: The linchpin of public diplomacy. Report of the Advisory Committee on Cultural Diplomacy, September. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/54374.pdf.
• U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2006. U.S. public diplomacy: State Department efforts to engage Muslim audiences lack certain communication elements and face significant challenges. May. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06535.pdf.
• U.S. Marine Corps Combat Development Command. 2005. Small wars/21st century. Washington, DC: U.S. Marine Corps.
• White House. 2006. National security strategy. March. http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/.
• Woolsey, James. 2003. At war for freedom. The Guardian, July 20. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/20/usa.terrorism.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Amr, H. Articles by Singer, P. W. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?