This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Brennan, J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Conundrum of Iran: Strengthening Moderates without Acquiescing to Belligerence

After nearly three decades of antagonistic rhetoric and diplomatic estrangement between the United States and Iran, the next president has the opportunity to set a new course for relations between the two countries. When the next president takes up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Iranian officials will be listening. The president must implement a policy of engagement that encourages moderates in Iran without implying tolerance for Tehran's historic support of terrorist activities. This strategy will require patience and sensitivity to the complex political realities inside Iran. To successfully chart a new course for U.S.-Iranian relations, the next president must (1) tone down rhetoric; (2) establish a direct dialogue with Tehran, including comprehensive, private discussions and deployment of a special envoy; (3) encourage greater assimilation of Hezbollah into Lebanon's political system; and (4) offer carrots in addition to sticks, including consideration of legitimate Iranian concerns on regional security issues.

Key Words: Iran • Hezbollah • United States • state-sponsored terrorism • Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps • IRGC • Shia Islam

References

• Council on Foreign Relations. 2007. Hamas. http://www.cfr.org/publication/8968.
• Dobbins, James. 2004. Time to deal with Iran. Washington Post, May 6. Via Rand Corporation, http://www.rand.org/commentary/050604WP.html.
• Ignatius, David. 2007. The spy who wants Israel to talk. Washington Post, November 11. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/09/AR2007110901941.
• Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies (CSS). 2006. Hezbollah as a strategic arm of Iran. September 8. http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/iran_hezbollah_elb.htm.
• International Crisis Group. 2007. Iran: Ahmadi-Nejad's tumultuous presidency. Update Briefing. http://www.crisisgroup.org/.
• McGirk, Tim. 2007. Is Hamas preparing for war? Time, April 2. http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1605760,00.html.
• National Intelligence Council. 2007. National Intelligence Estimate, Iran: Nuclear intentions and capabilities (Unclassified-key judgments, November). Washington, DC: National Intelligence Council.
• Sick, Gary. 2003. Iran: Confronting terrorism. The Washington Quarterly 26 (4): 83-98.[CrossRef]
• Terrorism Knowledge Base. 2007. Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). http://www.tkb.org.
• U.S. Department of Justice. 2001. Attorney general statement, June 21. http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/June/275ag.htm.
• U.S. Department of State. 2007. Country reports on terrorism. http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/crt/2006/82736.htm.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Google Scholar Articles by Brennan, J. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?