Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to watch the video

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craemer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Evolutionary Model of Racial Attitude Formation: Socially Shared and Idiosyncratic Racial Attitudes

Thomas Craemer

University of Tuebingen

A growing body of research in political science has uncovered evidence of a "split personality" among Americans when it comes to racial attitudes—people express different attitudes in public than they personally hold. At present no theoretical model can account for the emergence of this discrepancy. This article proposes a simple neural model of racial attitude formation that makes an important distinction between socially shared and idiosyncratic racial attitudes. A computational model based on Kimura's (1983) Neutral Theory of Evolution predicts that socially shared racist attitudes may be able to coexist with, and eventually be replaced by, more favorable idiosyncratic racial attitudes. Results of a laboratory-based study (N = 555) involving reaction-time-based implicit measures of socially shared and idiosyncratic attitudes are consistent with the predictions derived from the computational model. The implications of the theoretical model and the empirical findings are discussed.

Key Words: implicit racial attitudes • explicit racial attitudes • affirmative action • cognitive overlap • computational modeling • Hebbian learning • neutral theory of evolution • random drift

References

  • Anderson, N.H. 1968. Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9:272-79.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Aron, Arthur, Elaine N. Aron, Michael Tudor, and Greg Nelson. 1991. Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (2): 241-253.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ashburn-Nardo, Leslie, Megan L. Knowles, and Margo J. Monteith. 2003. Black Americans' implicit racial associations and their implications for intergroup judgment. Social Cognition 21 (1): 61-87.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2): 203-26.[Abstract]
  • Berinsky, Adam J. 2004. Can we talk? Self-presentation and the survey response. Political Psychology 25 (4): 643-59.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bradley, M.M. and P.J. Lang. 1999. Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW). Gainesville: The NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, University of Florida.
  • Coats, Susan, Eliot R. Smith, Heather M. Claypool, and Michele J. Banner. 2000. Overlapping mental representations of self and in-group: Reaction time evidence and its relationship with explicit measures of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36:304-15.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Craemer, Thomas. 2005. Ingroup derogation and the norm of racial pride. Divergence of implicit and explicit racial attitudes. Paper prepared for poster presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September.
  • ———. 2006. Forming pro-black policy preferences by "including outgroups in the self"? Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology in Barcelona, Spain, July.
  • Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Debbie E. McGee, Anthony G. Greenwald, and Mahzarin R. Banaji. 2000. Automatic preference for white Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36:316-28.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Devine, Patricia G. 1989. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56:5-18.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Fazio, Russell H., Joni R. Jackson, Bridget C. Dunton, and Carol J. Williams. 1995. Variability in automatic activation as unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 (6): 1013-27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Feldman, Stanely, and Leonie Huddy. 2005. Racial resentment and white opposition to race-conscious programs: Principles or prejudice? American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 168-83.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Greenwald, Anthony G., Mahzarin R. Banaji, Laurie A. Rudman, Shelly D. Farnham, Brian A. Nosek, and Deborah S. Mellott. 2002. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review 109 (1): 3-25.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Greenwald, Anthony G., Debbie E. McGhee, and Jordan L. K. Schwarz. 1995. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (6): 1464-80.
  • Hebb, Donald O. 1949. The organization of behavior. A neuropsychological theory. New York: John Wiley.
  • Jost, John T., Mahzarin R. Banaji, and Brian A. Nosek. 2004. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology 25 (6): 881-919.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kimura, Motoo. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kuklinski, James H., Michael D. Cobb, and Martin Gilens. 1997. Racial attitudes and the "New South." Journal of Politics 59 (2): 323-49.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • McPhee, William N. 1963. Formal theories of mass behavior. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
  • McPhee, William N., Jack Ferguson, and Robert B. Smith. 1963. A theory of informal social influence. In Formal theories of mass behavior, by William N. McPhee. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.
  • Neely, James H. 1977. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 106 (3): 226-54.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Nosek, Brian A., Mahzarin R. Banaji, and Anthony Greenwald. 2002. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration Web site. Group Dynamics: Theory Research, and Practice 6 (1): 101-15.[CrossRef]
  • Nowak, A., J. Szamrej, and B. Latané. 1990. From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review 97 (3): 362-76.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Smith, Eliot R., and Susan Henry. 1996. An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22 (6): 635-42.[Abstract]
  • Snyder, Mark, and Steven W. Gangestad. 1986. On the nature of self-monitoring. Journal for Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1): 125-39.[CrossRef]
  • Tate, Katherine. 1993. From protest to politics: The new black voters in American elections. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. When white voters evaluate black candidates: The processing implications of candidate skin color, prejudice, and self-monitoring. American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1032-53.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Wilson, T.D., S. Lindsey, and T.Y. Schooler. 2000. A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review 107:101-26.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 614, No. 1, 74-101 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716207305979


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craemer, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?