|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Biology of Political Behavior: An Introduction
John R. Hibbing
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Kevin B. Smith
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
A broad cross-section of the social sciences is increasingly turning to biology and evolutionary theory to help explain human behavior. Political science is a notable exception to this trend, even though there are sound conceptual reasons for expecting biological processes to play an important role in explaining political behavior. While agreeing with the conceptual arguments, the authors believe original empirical research is the most persuasive means of convincing political science to incorporate biology in explanations of political behavior. Techniques developed in neuroscience, behavioral genetics, agent-based simulation, experimental economics, and other fields offer exciting research opportunities to explore questions of central interest to political scientists. The research presented in this volume provides examples of replicable, empirical evidence that political beliefs and behavior are a product of biological as well as environmental factors.
Key Words: neuroscience • genetics • neurotransmitter • evolution • interdisciplinary
References
- Archer, J. 1991. The influence of testosterone on human aggression. British Journal of Psychology 82:1-28.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Booth, A., and J. Dabbs. 1993. Testosterone and men's marriages. Social Forces 72:463-77.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Bouchard, T.J., and M. McGue. 1990. Genetic and rearing environmental influences on adult personality: An analysis of adopted twins reared apart. Journal of Personality 58:263-92.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Buss, David M. 1999. Human nature and individual differences: The evolution of human personality. In Handbook of personality, 2nd ed., ed. Lawrence A. Pervin and Oliver P. John. New York: Guilford.
- Camerer, Colin, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec. 2005. Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature 34:9-55.
- Camerer, Colin, George Loewenstein, and Matthew Rabin. 2004. Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- de Waal, Frans B.M. 1982. Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. London: Jonathan Cape.
- ———. 1996. Good natured: The origins and right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Ding, Yuan-Chun, Han-Chang Chi, Deborah L. Grady, Atsuyuki Morishima, Judith R. Kidd, Kenneth K. Kidd, Pamela Flodman, M. Anne Spence, Sabrina Schuck, James M. Swanson, Ya-Ping Zhang, and Robert K. Moyzis. 2002. Evidence of positive selection acting at the human dopamine receptor D4 gene locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 (8): 309-14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gosling, S.D., and O.P. John. 1999. Personality dimensions in non-human animals: A cross-species perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8:69-75.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Harpending, Henry, and Gregory Cochran. 2002. In our genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 (8): 10-12.[Free Full Text]
- Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, H. Gintis, and R. McElreath. 2001. Cooperation, reciprocity, and punishment in fifteen small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91:73-78.[Web of Science]
- Lodge, Milton, and Charles Taber. 2005. The automaticity of affect for political candidates, parties, and issues. Political Psychology 26:455-82.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Madsen, Douglas. 1986. Power seekers are different: Further biochemical evidence. American Political Science Review 80:261-69.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael Mackuen. 2000. Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Massey, Douglas S. 2002. Emotion and the history of human society. American Sociological Review 67:1-29.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Orbell, John, Tomonori Morikawa, Jason Hartwig, James Hanley, and Nicholas Allen. 2004. Machiavellian intelligence as a basis for the evolution of cooperative dispositions. American Political Science Review 98:1-16.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Pickering, Alan D., and Jeffrey A. Gray. 1999. The neuroscience of personality. In Handbook of personality, 2nd ed., ed. Lawrence A. Pervin and Oliver P. John. New York: Guilford.
- Pinker, Steven. 2002. The blank slate. New York: Viking.
- Plomin, R., J.C. DeFries, G.E. McClearn, and P. McGuffin. 2001. Behavioral genetics. 4th ed. New York: Worth.
- Somit, Albert, and Steven A. Peterson. 1997. Darwinism, dominance, and democracy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
- Sullivan, D.G., and R.D. Masters. 1993. Nonverbal behavior, emotions, and democratic leadership. In Reconsidering the democratic polity, ed. G. Marcus and R. Hanson. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Tooby, John, and Leda Cosmides. 1992. The psychological foundations of culture. In The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the development of culture, ed. Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wahlke, John C. 1979. Pre-behavioralism in political science. American Political Science Review 73:9-31.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 614, No. 1,
6-14 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716207305471
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
|
|
