Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to watch the video

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alford, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hibbing, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Personal, Interpersonal, and Political Temperaments

John R. Alford

Rice University in Houston, Texas

John R. Hibbing

University of Nebraska-Lincoln. With Elizabeth Theiss-Morse

Are political liberals generous? Are political conservatives conscientious? Are generous people personally agreeable? Research in behavioral genetics and elsewhere increasingly indicates a biological basis for the manner in which people behave in personal, interpersonal, and political situations, but this biological basis does not mean behavior in these three very different contexts is correlated. In this article, using an original data set obtained from nearly three hundred subjects, the authors are able to test for the degree to which personal, interpersonal, and political temperaments are related. As expected, the overall correlations are quite low. Standard personality traits do not predict political attitudes, and neither political attitudes nor personality predicts the extent to which subjects are generous in interpersonal situations. Human behavior is partially biological, but the systems involved in shaping political behavior seem to be largely but not completely distinct from those involved in shaping personal and interpersonal behavior.

Key Words: temperament • political attitude • personality traits • behavior • ideology

References

  • Adorno, T., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. Levinson, and R. Sanford. 1950. The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
  • Altemeyer, Bob. 1981. Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
  • ———. 1996. The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Anderson, Lisa R., Jennifer M. Mellor, and Jeffrey Milyo. 2004. Do liberals play nice? The effects of party and political ideology in public goods and trust games. Unpublished Working Paper, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
  • Bachner-Melman, Rachel, Christian Dina, Ada H. Zohar, Naama Constantini, Elad Lerer, Sarah Hoch, Sarah Sella, Lubov Nemanov, Inga Gritsenko, Pesach Lichtenberg, et al. 2005. AVPR1 and SLC6A4 gene polymorphisms are associated with creative dance performance. PLoS Genetics 1:394-403.
  • Block, Jack, and Jeanne H. Block. 2005. Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality 39:395-422.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Boone, Christopher, Bert De Branbander, and Arjen van Witteloostuijn. 1999. The impact of personality on behavior in five Prisoner's Dilemma games. Journal of Economic Psychology 20:343-77.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bouchard, T.J., Jr., and Matt McGue. 2003. Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. Journal of Neurobiology 54:4-45.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Brandstatter, Hermann, and Werner Guth. 2002. Personality in dictator and ultimatum games. Central European Journal of Operations Research 10:191-215.
  • Caprara, G.V., C. Barbaranelli, and P.G. Zimbardo. 1999. Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology 20:175-97.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Caprara, G.V., S. Schwartz, C. Capanna, M. Vecchione, and C. Barbaranelli. 2006. Personality and politics: Values, traits, and political choice. Political Psychology 27:1-28.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Carmen, Ira. 2007. Genetic configurations of political phenomena. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614:34-55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Comings, D.E., R. Gade-Andavoluy, N. Gonzales, S. Wu, D. Muhleman, H. Blake, M.B. Mann, G. Dietz, G. Saucier, and J.P. MacMurray. 2000. A multivariate analysis of 59 candidate genes in personality traits: The Temperament and Character Inventory. Clinical Genetics 58:375-85.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Comrey, A.L., and J.A. Newmeyer. 1965. Measurement of radicalism-conservatism. Journal of Social Psychology 67:357-69.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • De Waal, Frans B. M., 1982. Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. London: Jonathan Cape.
  • ———. 1996. Good natured: The origins and right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • DeYoung, Colin G., Jordan B. Peterson, and Daniel M. Higgins. 2005. Sources of openness/intellect: Cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality 73:825-58.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fehr, Ernst, Urs Fischbacher, Bernhard von Rosenbladt, Jurgen Schupp, and Gert G. Wagner. 2002. A nation-wide laboratory—Examining trust and trustworthiness by integrating behavioral experiments into representative surveys. Schmollers Jahrbuch 122 (4): 519-42.
  • Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the matter with Kansas? New York: Metropolitan Books.
  • Jost, John T. 2006. The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist 61:651-70.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Jost, John T., Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski, and Frank J. Sulloway. 2003. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129:339-75.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Lakoff, George. 2006. Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
  • McClosky, Herbert. 1958. Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review 52:27-45.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • McCrae, Robert R., and Paul T. Costa Jr. 1999. A five-factor theory of personality. In Handbook of personality, 2nd ed., ed. Lawrence A. Pervin and Oliver P. John. New York: Guilford.
  • Mehrabian, Albert. 1996. Relations among political attitudes, personality, and psychopathology. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 18:469-91.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Mestelman, Stuart, and David Feeny. 1988. Does ideology matter? Anecdotal experimental evidence on the voluntary provision of public goods. Public Choice 57:287-94.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Mondak, Jeffery J., and Karen D. Halperin. Forthcoming. A framework for the study of personality and political behavior. British Journal of Political Science.
  • Pratto, F., J. Sidanius, L.M. Stallworth, and B.F. Malle. 1994. Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67:741-63.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Ray, John J. 1985. Defective validity in the Altemeyer Authoritarianism Scale. Journal of Social Psychology 125:271-72.[Web of Science]
  • Shils, Edward A. 1954. Authoritarianism: Right and left. In Studies in the scope and method of the authoritarian personality, ed. Richard Christie and Marie Jahoda. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Swope, Kurtis J., John Cadigan, Pamela M. Schmitt, and Robert S. Shupp. 2005. Personality preferences in laboratory economics experiments. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
  • van Gestel, S., and C. van Broeckhoven. 2003. Genetics of personality: Are we making progress? Molecular Psychiatry 8:840-52.
  • Whitaker, Eric. 2006. Personality and political orientation: A reanalysis of an age-old question. Unpublished paper, Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska— Lincoln.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 614, No. 1, 196-212 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716207305621
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alford, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hibbing, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?