Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huddy, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Political Consequences of Perceived Threat and Felt Insecurity

Leonie Huddy

Center for Survey Research at Stony Brook University, New York

Stanley Feldman

Stony Brook University

Christopher Weber

Stony Brook University

The authors draw on data from a national random digit dial (RDD) telephone sample of 1,549 adult Americans conducted between October 15, 2001, and March 2, 2002, to explore the impact of a need for security on support for national security policies in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. They examine support for protective government policies among individuals who vary in their ability to feel secure in the aftermath of terrorism, exploring the interaction between perceived threat and felt security. Most Americans reported a sense of security after the 9/11 attacks. But a sense of insecurity among a minority of Americans coupled with a perceived threat of future terrorism increased support for both domestic and international security policy—the curtailment of domestic civil liberties, tougher visa checks, and support for the war in Afghanistan. The authors' findings underscore the diverse ways in which individuals react politically to a common external threat.

Key Words: threat • public opinion • security • attachment theory

References

  • Ainsworth, M.D.S. 1991. Attachments and other affectional bonds across the life cycle. In Attachment across the life cycle, ed. C. M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, and P. Marris, 33-51. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
  • Ainsworth, M.D.S., M.C. Blehar, E. Waters, and S. Walls. 1978. Patterns of attachment: Assessed in the strange situation and at home. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bar-Tal, D., and D. Labin. 2001. The effect of a major event on stereotyping: Terrorist attacks in Israel and Israeli adolescents' perceptions of Palestinians, Jordanians and Arabs. European Journal of Social Psychology 31:265-80.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bartholomew, K., and L.M. Horowitz. 1991. Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61:226-44.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Belsky, J. 1999. Modern evolutionary theory and patterns of attachment. In Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, ed. J. Cassidy and P. R. Shaver, 141-61. New York: Guilford.
  • Bowlby, J. [1969] 1982. Attachment and loss: Attachment (Volume 1). New York: Basic Books.
  • Brennan, K.A., and P.R. Shaver. 1995. Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21:267-83.[Abstract]
  • Browne, M.J., and R.E. Hoyt. 2000. The demand for flood insurance: Empirical evidence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20:271-89.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Buss, D.M., and D.P. Schmitt. 1993. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 100:204-32.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Chisholm, J.S. 1996. The evolutionary ecology of attachment organization. Human Nature 7 (1): 1-38.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Crenshaw, Martha. 1986. The psychology of political terrorism. In Political psychology, ed. Margaret G. Hermann. New York: Jossey-Bass.
  • Davis, D.W., and B.D. Silver. 2004. Civil liberties versus security in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science 48:28-46.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Eysenck, M.W. 1992. Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Fernald, A. 1992. Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: An evolutionary perspective. In The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby, 391-428. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ferraro, K.A. 1996. Women's fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault? Social Forces 75:667-90.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Florian, V., M. Mikulincer, and G. Hirschberger. 2002. The anxiety-buffering function of close relationships: Evidence that relationship commitment acts as a terror management mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82: 527-542.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fraley, R.C. 2002. Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review 6 (2): 123-51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Fraley, R.C., C.C. Brumbaugh, and M.J. Marks. 2005. The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative and phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89:731-46.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Fraley, R.C., D.A. Fazzari, G.A. Bonanno, and S. Dekel. 2006. Attachment and psychological adaptation in high exposure survivors of the September 11th attack on the World Trade Center. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (4): 538-51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Friedland, N., and A. Merari. 1985. The psychological impact of terrorism: A double-edged sword. Political Psychology 6:591-604.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Goldberg, S. 2000. Attachment and development. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Gordon, C., and A. Arian. 2001. Threat and decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45:197-215.
  • Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetic evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1-52.
  • Hart, J., P. Shaver, and J. Goldenberg. 2005. Attachment, self-esteem, worldviews, and terror management: Evidence for a tripartite security system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88:999-1013.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hazan, C., and P.R. Shaver. 1987. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52:511-24.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Herrmann, Richard K., Philip E. Tetlock, and Penny S. Visser. 1999. Mass public decisions to go to war: A cognitive-interactionist framework. American Political Science Review 93 (3): 553-73.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Huddy, L., S. Feldman, T. Capelos, and C. Provost. 2002. The consequences of terrorism: Disentangling the effects of personal and national threat. Political Psychology 23:485-509.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Huddy, L., S. Feldman, and E. Cassese. 2007. On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In The political dynamics of feeling and thinking, ed. A. Crigler, M. MacKuen, G. E. Marcus, and W. R. Neuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Huddy, L., S. Feldman, C. Taber, and G. Lahav. 2005. Threat, anxiety, and support of anti-terrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science 49:610-25.
  • Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and post-modernization: Political, cultural, and economic change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Jentleson, B. 1992. The pretty prudent public: Post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of force. International Studies Quarterly 36:49-74[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Jentleson, B.W., and R.L. Britton. 1998. Still pretty prudent: Post—cold war American public opinion on the use of military force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42:395-417.[Abstract]
  • Kirkpatrick, L.A. 1998. Evolution, pair-bonding, and reproductive strategies: A reconceptualization of adult attachment. In Attachment theory and close relationships, ed. J. A. Simpson and W. S. Rholes, 353-93. New York: Guilford.
  • Kraemer, G.W. 1992. A psychobiological theory of attachment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (3): 493-541.[Web of Science]
  • Lavrakas, P.J. 1993. Telephone survey methods: Sampling, selection and supervision. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Lerner, J.S., and D. Keltner. 2000. Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition and Emotion 14 (4): 473-93.[CrossRef]
  • ———. 2001. Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81:146-59.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Losch, M.E., A. Maitland, G. Lutz, P. Mariolis, and S. Gleason. 2002. The effect of time of year of data collection on sample efficiency. Public Opinion Quarterly 66:594-607.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Lowenstein, G.F., E.U. Weber, C.K. Haste, and N. Welch. 2001. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 127:267-86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Marcus, G.E., J.L. Sullivan, E. Theiss-Morse, and S.L. Wood. 1995. With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maslow, Abraham H. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50 (4): 370-96.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Mikulincer, M., G. Birnbaum, D. Woddis, and O. Nachmias. 2000. Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78 (3): 509-23.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mikulincer, M., and V. Florian. 2000. Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience— Does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79:260-73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mikulincer, M., V. Florian, and A. Weller. 1993. Attachment styles, coping strategies, and posttraumatic psychological distress: The impact of the Gulf War in Israel. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (5): 817-26.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Mikulincer, M., and P. Shaver. 2001. Attachment theory and intergroup bias: Evidence that priming the secure base schema attenuates negative reactions to out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81:97-115.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • ———. 2003. The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 35, ed. M. P. Zanna, 53-152. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Mueller, J.E. 1973. War, presidents, and public opinion. New York: John Wiley.
  • Pyszczynski, T., S. Solomon, and J. Greenberg. 2002. In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: APA.
  • Raghunathan, R., and M.T. Pham. 1999. All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79:56-77.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Sattler, D.N., C.F. Kaiser, and J.B. Hittner. 2000. Disaster preparedness: Relationships among prior experience, personal characteristics, and distress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 37:1396-1420.
  • Schmitt, D.P. 2005. Is short-term mating the maladaptive result of insecure attachment? A test of competing evolutionary perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (6): 747-68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Simpson, J.A., W.A. Collins, S.S. Tran, and K.C. Haydon. 2007. Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in romantic relationships: A developmental perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92:355-67.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Solomon, Z., K. Ginzburg, M. Mikulincer, Y. Neria, and A. Ohry. 1998. Coping with war captivity: The role of attachment style. European Journal of Personality 12:271-85.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Sroufe, L.A., and E. Waters. 1977. Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development 48:1184-99.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Steeh, C., N. Kirgis, B. Cannon, and Jeff DeWitt. 2001. Are they really as bad as they seem? Nonresponse rates at the end of the twentieth century. Journal of Official Statistics 17:227-47.
  • Sullivan, J.L., J. Piereson, and G.E. Marcus. 1982. Political tolerance and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Tancredy, C.M., and R.C. Fraley. 2006. The nature of adult twin relationships: An attachment-theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (1): 78-93.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Taubman Ben-Ari, O., L. Findler, and M. Mikulincer. 2002. The effects of mortality salience on relationship strivings and beliefs: The moderating role of attachment style. British Journal of Social Psychology 41:419-41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Taubman Ben-Ari, O., and M. Mikulincer. 2007. The effects of dispositional attachment orientations and contextual priming of attachment security on reckless driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 10:123-38.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Weber, C., and C. Federico. 2007. Interpersonal attachment and patterns of ideological belief. Political Psychology 28 (4): 389-416.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Zeifman, D., and C. Hazan. 1997. Attachment: The bond in pair-bonds. In Evolutionary social psychology, ed. J. A. Simpson and D. T. Kenrick, 237-63. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 614, No. 1, 131-153 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716207305951
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huddy, L.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?