Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to view The AAPSS Blog

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennion, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Caught in the Ground Wars: Mobilizing Voters during a Competitive Congressional Campaign

Elizabeth A. Bennion

Indiana University South Bend

This project examines the effectiveness of a nonpartisan voter mobilization drive in Indiana’s fiercely contested Second Congressional District. A student-based, non-partisan voter mobilization coalition conveyed nonpartisan get-out-the-vote messages through door-to-door canvassing in three South Bend precincts on the weekend before the November 2002 election. These get-out the vote efforts took place during a competitive election season—one that included door-to-door partisan campaign efforts by interest groups, political parties, and candidate campaigns. While the nonpartisan mobilization campaign did little to increase the likelihood of voting among older voters, it had a strong effect on voters younger than thirty—the voters least likely to be contacted by partisan campaigns.

Key Words: voter mobilization • voter turnout • youth vote • GOTV • Indiana • 2002 election

References

  • Abramson, Paul R., and John H. Aldrich. 1982. The decline of electoral participation in American politics. American Political Science Review 76 (3): 502-521.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Adams, William C., and Dennis J. Smith. 1980. Effects of telephone canvassing on turnout and preferences: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly 44 (3): 389-395.
  • Ansolabehere, Steven, and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going negative: How attack ads shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
  • Bennett, Stephen E. 1991. Left behind: Exploring declining turnout among noncollege young whites, 1964-1988. Social Science Quarterly 72 (2): 314-333.
  • Bennett, Stephen E. 1997. Why young Americans hate politics and what we should do about it. PS: Political Sciences and Politics 30:47-53.[CrossRef]
  • Caldeira, Gregory A., Aage R. Clausen, and Samuel C. Patterson. 1990. Partisan mobilization and electoral participation. Electoral Studies 9 (32): 564-571.
  • Cassel, Carol A., and Robert C. Luskin. 1988. Simple explanations of turnout decline. American Political Science Review 82 (4): 1321-1330.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Cavanagh, Thomas E. 1981. Changes in American voter turnout, 1964-1976. Political Science Quarterly 96 (1): 53-65.[CrossRef]
  • Eldersveld, Samuel J. 1956. Experimental propaganda techniques and voting behavior. American Political Science Review 50 (1): 154-165.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Fox Piven, Frances, and Richard A. Coward. 2000. Why Americans still don’t vote: And why politicians want it that way. Boston: Beacon.
  • Franklin, Mark N., and Wolfgang P. Hirczy de Mino. 1998. Separated powers, divided government, and turn-out in U.S. presidential election. American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 316-326.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Gerber, Alan S., and Donald P. Green. 2000. The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review 95 (3): 654-663.
  • Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green, and David W. Nickerson. 2001. Testing for publication bias in political science. Political Analysis 9:385-392.
  • Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green, and Ron Shachar. 2003. Voting may be habit forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 540-550.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Gosnell, Harold F. 1927. Getting-out-the-vote: An experiment in the stimulation of voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Green, Donald P., and Alan S. Gerber. 2004. Get out the vote! How to increase voter turnout. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Green, Donald P., Alan S. Gerber, and David W. Nickerson. 2003. Getting out the youth vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1083-1096.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Green, Donald P., and Ron Shachar. 2000. Habit formation and political behaviour: Evidence of consuetude in voter turnout. British Journal of Political Science 30:561-563.
  • Kramer, Gerald H. 1970. The effects of precinct-level canvassing on voter behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly 34 (4): 560-572.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Levine, Peter, and Mark Hugo Lopez. 2002. Youth voter turnout has declined by any measure. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) Fact Sheet. University of Maryland.
  • McDonald, Michael P., and Samuel L. Popkin. 2001. The myth of the vanishing voter. American Political Science Review 95 (4): 963-974.[Web of Science]
  • Michelson, Melissa R. 2003. Getting out the Latino vote: How door-to-door canvassing influences voter turn-out in rural central California. Political Behavior 25 (3): 247-263.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Michelson, Melissa R., and Herbert Villa Jr. 2003. Mobilizing the Latino youth vote. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Denver, CO.
  • Miller, Roy E., David A. Bositis, and Denise L. Baer. 1981. Stimulating voter turnout in a primary: Field experiment with a precinct committeeman. International Political Science Review 2 (4): 445-460.
  • Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The new American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Nickerson, David W. 2002. Hunting the elusive young voter. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29-September 1, Boston.
  • Nickerson, David W. 2004. Measuring interpersonal influence, Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
  • Patterson, Thomas E. 2002. The vanishing voter: Public involvement in an age of uncertainty. New York: Knopf.
  • Popkin, Samuel L., and Michael P. McDonald. 2000. Turnout’s not as bad as you think. The Washington Post, November 5, p. B01.
  • Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Roos, John, and Christopher Rodriguez. 2003. Indiana Second District—Hoosier values and outside money. PS Online e-Symposium. www.apsanet.org/PS/.
  • Rosenstone, Steven J., and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
  • Shaffer, Stephan D. 1981. A multivariate explanation of decreasing turnout in presidential elections, 1960-1976. American Journal of Political Science 25 (1): 68-95.
  • Teixeira, Ruy. 1992. The disappearing American voter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Wattenberg, Martin P. 2002. Where have all the voters gone? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Wolfinger, Raymond, and Stephen J. Rosentone. 1980. Who votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 601, No. 1, 123-141 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716205277863


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
R. Ramirez
Segmented Mobilization: Latino Nonpartisan Get-Out-the-Vote Efforts in the 2000 General Election
American Politics Research, March 1, 2007; 35(2): 155 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. E. Bergan, A. S. Gerber, D. P. Green, and C. Panagopoulos
Grassroots Mobilization and Voter Turnout in 2004
Public Opin Q, January 1, 2005; 69(5): 760 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bennion, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?