Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to view The AAPSS Blog

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Micheletti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stolle, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mobilizing Consumers to Take Responsibility for Global Social Justice

Michele Micheletti

Karlstad University, Sweden

Dietlind Stolle

McGill University, Montréal, Canada

This article studies the antisweatshop movement's involvement in global social justice responsibility-taking. The movement's growth (more than one hundred diverse groups) makes it a powerful force of social change in the new millennium. The rise of global corporate capitalism has taken a toll on political responsibility. As a response, four important movement actors—unions, antisweatshop associations, international humanitarian organizations, and Internet spin doctors—have focused on garment-production issues and mobilized consumers into vigilant action. The authors examine these actors, their social justice responsibility claims, and their views on the role of consumers in social justice responsibility-taking. The authors determine four paths of consumer action: (1) support group for other causes, (2) critical mass of shoppers, (3) agent of corporate change, and (4) ontological force for societal change. The authors find that the movement mobilizes consumers through actor-oriented and event-specific (episodic) framing and offer a few results on its ability to change consumer patterns and effect corporate change.

Key Words: responsibility-taking • political consumerism • antisweatshop movement • effectiveness

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 611, No. 1, 157-175 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716206298712


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Labor Studies JournalHome page
D. W. Wimberley
Setting the Stage for Cross-Border Solidarity: Movement Spillover and Early Mobilization in the Nicaragua Labor Rights Campaign
Labor Studies Journal, September 1, 2009; 34(3): 318 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
M. R. Nelson, M. A. Rademacher, and H.-J. Paek
Downshifting Consumer = Upshifting Citizen? An Examination of a Local Freecycle Community
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2007; 611(1): 141 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
D. V. Shah, D. M. McLeod, E. Kim, Sun Young Lee, M. R. Gotlieb, S. S. Ho, and H. Breivik
Political Consumerism: How Communication and Consumption Orientations Drive "Lifestyle Politics"
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2007; 611(1): 217 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]