The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to view The AAPSS Blog

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roscigno, V. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bobbitt-Zeher, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 609, No. 1, 16-48 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716206294898
© 2007 American Academy of Political & Social Science

Social Closure and Processes of Race/Sex Employment Discrimination

Vincent J. Roscigno

Ohio State University

Lisette M. Garcia

Donna Bobbitt-Zeher

Research on race and gender inequalities in employment typically infers discrimination as an important causal mechanism. The authors' systematic explication of social closure as a discriminatory mechanism reveals that traditional analyses of structural effects and process are not competing, but rather complementary. Analyzing race and sex discrimination cases filed in Ohio from 1988 to 2003, the authors highlight dominant processes of social closure that impact discriminatory exclusion, expulsion, mobility, and harassment on the job. Rather than employing the typical cause and effect modeling centering on outcomes, qualitative analyses serve to clarify discriminatory processes at play. Commonalities between race and sex (e.g., particularistic criteria in evaluation) emerge, as do specific racialized and gendered processes. The authors discuss similarities and differences in process; tie qualitative insights to the existing literature; and discuss the implications of their results for theoretical formulations of structure, agency, and inequality within institutional/ organizational environments and society at large.

Key Words: discrimination • race and gender inequality • social closure • harassment • mobility • hiring


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
J. M. Keil and C. A. Christie-Mizell
Beliefs, Fertility, and Earnings of African American, Hispanic, and Non-Hispanic White Mothers
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, August 1, 2008; 30(3): 299 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]