Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pridemore, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, S.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Democratization and Political Change as Threats to Collective Sentiments: Testing Durkheim in Russia

William Alex Pridemore

Criminal justice faculty at Indiana University, Russian and East European Institute

Sang-Weon Kim

Department of Police Science faculty at Dong-Eui University in Busan, South Korea

Durkheim argued that acute political crises result in increased homicide rates because they pose a threat to sentiments about the collective. Though crucial to Durkheim’s work on homicide, this idea remains untested. The authors took advantage of the natural experiment of the collapse of the Soviet Union to examine this hypothesis. Using data from Russian regions (N = 78) and controlling for measures of anomie and other covariates, the authors estimated the association between political change and change in homicide rates between 1991 and 2000. Results indicated that regions exhibiting less support for the Communist Party in 2000 (and thus greater change in political ideals because the Party had previously exercised complete control) were regions with greater increases in homicide rates. Thus, while democratization may be a positive development relative to the Communist juggernaut of the past, it appears that the swift political change in Russia is partially responsible for the higher rates of violence there following the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Key Words: Russia • democratization • political change • crime • violence • homicide

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 605, No. 1, 82-103 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716206286859


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Homicide StudiesHome page
J. P. Stamatel
Using Mortality Data to Refine Our Understanding of Homicide Patterns in Select Postcommunist Countries
Homicide Studies, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 117 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
S. Karstedt
Democracy, Values, and Violence: Paradoxes, Tensions, and Comparative Advantages of Liberal Inclusion
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2006; 605(1): 50 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]