This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (18) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Burby, R. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing About Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

The unprecedented losses from Hurricane Katrina can be explained by two paradoxes. The safe development paradox is that in trying to make hazardous areas safer, the federal government in fact substantially increased the potential for catastrophic property damages and economic loss. The local government paradox is that while their citizens bear the brunt of human suffering and financial loss in disasters, local officials pay insufficient attention to policies to limit vulnerability. The author demonstrates in this article that in spite of the two paradoxes, disaster losses can be blunted if local governments prepare comprehensive plans that pay attention to hazard mitigation. The federal government can take steps to increase local government commitment to planning and hazard mitigation by making relatively small adjustments to the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and the Flood Insurance Act. To be more certain of reducing disaster losses, however, the author suggests that we need a major reorientation of the National Flood Insurance Program from insuring individuals to insuring communities.

Key Words: Hurricane Katrina • disasters • public policy • hazard mitigation • comprehensive plans • building codes • state planning mandate • National Flood Insurance Program

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 604, No. 1, 171-191 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716205284676


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E.-K. O. Lee, Ce Shen, and T. V. Tran Coping With Hurricane Katrina: Psychological Distress and Resilience Among African American Evacuees Journal of Black Psychology, February 1, 2009; 35(1): 5 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Birkland and S. Waterman Is Federalism the Reason for Policy Failure in Hurricane Katrina? Publius, September 1, 2008; 38(4): 692 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Levine, A.-M. Esnard, and A. Sapat Population Displacement and Housing Dilemmas Due to Catastrophic Disasters Journal of Planning Literature, August 1, 2007; 22(1): 3 - 15. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. L. Waugh Jr. and R. B. Smith Economic Development and Reconstruction on the Gulf After Katrina Economic Development Quarterly, August 1, 2006; 20(3): 211 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. R. Berke and T. J. Campanella Planning for Postdisaster Resiliency The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, March 1, 2006; 604(1): 192 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Kunreuther Disaster Mitigation and Insurance: Learning from Katrina The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, March 1, 2006; 604(1): 208 - 227. [Abstract] [PDF]