This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ramírez, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Giving Voice to Latino Voters: A Field Experiment on the Effectiveness of a National Nonpartisan Mobilization Effort

Department of Political Science, University of Southern California

In this article, I present a summary of the findings of a randomized field experiment of 465,134 registered Latino voters, the largest such experiment on Latinos to date. The National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials’s (NALEO’s) Voces del Pueblo voter mobilization effort in 2002 explored three alternative modes of communicating with voters: direct mail, robotic phone calls, and live phone calls from volunteers. Of the three, only live phone calls produced a statistically significant increase in voter turnout. The ineffectiveness of direct mail and robotic calls is consistent with results from other experimental campaigns. What remains unclear is the extent to which direct mail and robotic calls targeting low-propensity Latino voters would be more effective in presidential elections. For the present, it appears that the most effective way to mobilize low-propensity Latino voters is through phone banks staffed by volunteers.

Key Words: NALEO • Latino voters • Voces del Pueblo • voter mobilization • random assignment • canvassing

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 601, No. 1, 66-84 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716205278422


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Barreto, M. Cohen-Marks, and N. D. Woods Are All Precincts Created Equal?: The Prevalence of Low-Quality Precincts in Low-Income and Minority Communities Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2009; 62(3): 445 - 458. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Barreto, S. Manzano, R. Ramirez, and K. Rim Mobilization, Participation, and Solidaridad: Latino Participation in the 2006 Immigration Protest Rallies Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2009; 44(5): 736 - 764. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Ha and D. S. Karlan Get-Out-The-Vote Phone Calls: Does Quality Matter? American Politics Research, March 1, 2009; 37(2): 353 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Panagopoulos Partisan and Nonpartisan Message Content and Voter Mobilization: Field Experimental Evidence Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2009; 62(1): 70 - 76. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Ramirez Segmented Mobilization: Latino Nonpartisan Get-Out-the-Vote Efforts in the 2000 General Election American Politics Research, March 1, 2007; 35(2): 155 - 175. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Trivedi The Effect of Identity-Based GOTV Direct Mail Appeals on the Turnout of Indian Americans The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2005; 601(1): 115 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. S. Gerber and D. P. Green Do Phone Calls Increase Voter Turnout? An Update The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, September 1, 2005; 601(1): 142 - 154. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. E. Bergan, A. S. Gerber, D. P. Green, and C. Panagopoulos Grassroots Mobilization and Voter Turnout in 2004 Public Opin Q, January 1, 2005; 69(5): 760 - 777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]