This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bosk, C. L. Articles by De Vries, R. G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Bureaucracies of Mass Deception: Institutional Review Boards and the Ethics of Ethnographic Research

The Leonard Davis Institute for Health Services Research, Department of Medical Sociology at the University of Pennsylvania

Raymond G. De Vries

St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota

Ethnographers have long been unhappy with the review of their research proposals by institutional review boards (IRBs). In this article, we offer a sociological view of the problems associated with prospective IRB review of ethnographic research. Compared with researchers in other fields, social scientists have been less willing to accommodate themselves to IRB oversight; we identify the reasons for this reluctance, and in an effort to promote such accommodation, we suggest several steps to reduce the frustration associated with IRB review of ethnographic research. We conclude by encouraging ethnographers to be alert to the ways the procedural and bureaucratic demands of IRBs can displace their efforts to solve the serious ethical dilemmas posed by ethnography.

Key Words: research ethics • institutional review boards • ethnography • research methods

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 595, No. 1, 249-263 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716204266913


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?