This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Tyler, T. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Enhancing Police Legitimacy

This article makes three points. First, the police need public support and cooperation to be effective in their order-maintenance role, and they particularly benefit when they have the voluntary support and cooperation of most members of the public, most of the time. Second, such voluntary support and cooperation is linked to judgments about the legitimacy of the police. A central reason people cooperate with the police is that they view them as legitimate legal authorities, entitled to be obeyed. Third, a key antecedent of public judgments about the legitimacy of the police and of policing activities involves public assessments of the manner in which the police exercise their authority. Such procedural-justice judgments are central to public evaluations of the police and influence such evaluations separately from assessments of police effectiveness in fighting crime. These findings suggest the importance of enhancing public views about the legitimacy of the police and suggest process-based strategies for achieving that objective.

Key Words: police • legitimacy • compliance • trust and confidence

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 593, No. 1, 84-99 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716203262627


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Weisburd, T. Jonathan, and S. Perry The Israeli Model for Policing Terrorism: Goals, Strategies, and Open Questions Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 2009; 36(12): 1259 - 1278. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Y. Warren and A. Farrell The Environmental Context of Racial Profiling The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2009; 623(1): 52 - 63. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. A. Theobald and D. P. Haider-Markel Race, Bureaucracy, and Symbolic Representation: Interactions between Citizens and Police J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., April 1, 2009; 19(2): 409 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Neyroud and E. Disley Technology and Policing: Implications for Fairness and Legitimacy Policing, June 17, 2008; (2008) pan017v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hawdon Legitimacy, Trust, Social Capital, and Policing Styles: A Theoretical Statement Police Quarterly, June 1, 2008; 11(2): 182 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Sharp and S. Atherton To Serve and Protect?: The Experiences of Policing in the Community of Young People from Black and Other Ethnic Minority Groups Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 746 - 763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Reisig, J. Bratton, and M. G. Gertz The Construct Validity and Refinement of Process-Based Policing Measures Criminal Justice and Behavior, August 1, 2007; 34(8): 1005 - 1028. [Abstract] [PDF]