This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Weisburd, D. Articles by Eck, J. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear?

Hebrew University Law School; University of Maryland-College Park.

John E. Eck

Division of Criminal Justice at the University of Cincinnati.

The authors review research on police effectiveness in reducing crime, disorder, and fear in the context of a typology of innovation in police practices. That typology emphasizes two dimensions: one concerning the diversity of approaches, and the other, the level of focus. The authors find that little evidence supports the standard model of policing—low on both of these dimensions. In contrast, research evidence does support continued investment in police innovations that call for greater focus and tailoring of police efforts, combined with an expansion of the tool box of policing beyond simple law enforcement. The strongest evidence of police effectiveness in reducing crime and disorder is found in the case of geographically focused police practices, such as hot-spots policing. Community policing practices are found to reduce fear of crime, but the authors do not find consistent evidence that community policing (when it is implemented without models of problem-oriented policing) affects either crime or disorder. A developing body of evidence points to the effectiveness of problemoriented policing in reducing crime, disorder, and fear. More generally, the authors find that many policing practices applied broadly throughout the United States either have not been the subject of systematic research or have been examined in the context of research designs that do not allow practitioners or policy makers to draw very strong conclusions.

Key Words: police • evaluations • crime • disorder • hot spots • problem-oriented policing • community policing

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 593, No. 1, 42-65 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716203262548


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Weisburd, T. Jonathan, and S. Perry The Israeli Model for Policing Terrorism: Goals, Strategies, and Open Questions Criminal Justice and Behavior, December 1, 2009; 36(12): 1259 - 1278. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Terpstra Community Policing in Practice: Ambitions and Realization Policing, August 24, 2009; (2009) pap029v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Boba, D. Weisburd, and J. W. Meeker The Limits of Regional Data Sharing and Regional Problem Solving: Observations From the East Valley, CA COMPASS Initiative Police Quarterly, March 1, 2009; 12(1): 22 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Taylor, A. Kowalyk, and R. Boba The Integration of Crime Analysis Into Law Enforcement Agencies: An Exploratory Study Into the Perceptions of Crime Analysts Police Quarterly, June 1, 2007; 10(2): 154 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Weisburd Hot Spots Policing Experiments and Criminal Justice Research: Lessons from the Field The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2005; 599(1): 220 - 245. [Abstract] [PDF]