|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Nonexperimental Versus Experimental Estimates of Earnings Impacts
Steven Glazerman
Mathematica Policy Research
Dan M. Levy
Mathematica Policy Research, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
David Myers
Mathematica Policy Research
To assess nonexperimental (NX) evaluation methods in the context of welfare, job training, and employment services programs, the authors reexamined the results of twelve case studies intended to replicate impact estimates from an experimental evaluation by using NX methods. They found that the NX methods sometimes came close to replicating experimentally derived results but often produced estimates that differed by policy-relevant margins, which the authors interpret as estimates of bias. Although the authors identified several study design factors associated with smaller discrepancies, no combination of factors would consistently eliminate discrepancies. Even with a large number of impact estimates, the positive and negative bias estimates did not always cancel each other out. Thus, it was difficult to identify an aggregation strategy that consistently removed bias while answering a focused question about earnings impacts of a program. They conclude that although the empirical evidence from this literature can be used in the context of training and welfare programs to improve NX research designs, it cannot on its own justify the use of such designs.
Key Words: nonexperimental quasi-experimental design replication
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 589, No. 1,
63-93 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716203254879

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Stuart and D. B. Rubin
Matching With Multiple Control Groups With Adjustment for Group Differences
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,
September 1, 2008;
33(3):
279 - 306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Freedman and R. A. Berk
Weighting Regressions by Propensity Scores
Eval Rev,
August 1, 2008;
32(4):
392 - 409.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Frank, G. Sykes, D. Anagnostopoulos, M. Cannata, L. Chard, A. Krause, and R. McCrory
Does NBPTS Certification Affect the Number of Colleagues a Teacher Helps With Instructional Matters?
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
March 1, 2008;
30(1):
3 - 30.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Ho, K. Imai, G. King, and E. A. Stuart
Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference
Political Analysis,
July 1, 2007;
15(3):
199 - 236.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Arceneaux, A. S. Gerber, and D. P. Green
Comparing Experimental and Matching Methods Using a Large-Scale Voter Mobilization Experiment
Political Analysis,
January 1, 2006;
14(1):
37 - 62.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Luellen, W. R. Shadish, and M. H. Clark
Propensity Scores: An Introduction and Experimental Test
Eval Rev,
December 1, 2005;
29(6):
530 - 558.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. W. Sherman and H. Strang
Experimental Ethnography: The Marriage of Qualitative and Quantitative Research
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
September 1, 2004;
595(1):
204 - 222.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. W. Sherman and H. Strang
Verdicts or Inventions?: Interpreting Results from Randomized Controlled Experiments in Criminology
American Behavioral Scientist,
January 1, 2004;
47(5):
575 - 607.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|