This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sherman, L. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Misleading Evidence and Evidence-Led Policy: Making Social Science more Experimental

University of Pennsylvania, Fels Institute of Government, Jerry Lee Center of Criminology

Increasing demands by government for "evidence-led" policy raise the risk that research evidence will mislead government rather than leading to an unbiased conclusion. The need for unbiased research conclusions has never been greater, yet few consumers of research understand the statistical biases with which science must always struggle. This article introduces the volume's discussion of those issues with an explanation of the major threats of bias in social science research and a map of the differing scientific opinions on how to deal with those threats. The thesis of the volume is that many of these threats could be reduced by making social science more experimental. The fact that even experimental evidence contains threats of bias does not alter that claim but merely suggests another: that educated consumers of social science may be the best defense against misleading evidence of all kinds.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 589, No. 1, 6-19 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716203256266


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. R. Hollin, J. McGuire, J. C. Hounsome, R. M. Hatcher, C. A.L. Bilby, and E. J. Palmer Cognitive Skills Behavior Programs for Offenders in the Community: A Reconviction Analysis Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 2008; 35(3): 269 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. H. Weiss, E. Murphy-Graham, A. Petrosino, and A. G. Gandhi The Fairy Godmother--and Her Warts: Making the Dream of Evidence-Based Policy Come True American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2008; 29(1): 29 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. R. Hollin Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: Does only randomization glister? JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 89 - 106. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. G. Gandhi, E. Murphy-Graham, A. Petrosino, S. S. Chrismer, and C. H. Weiss The Devil Is in the Details: Examining the Evidence for "Proven" School-Based Drug Abuse Prevention Programs Eval Rev, February 1, 2007; 31(1): 43 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Kingsnorth Intimate Partner Violence: Predictors of Recidivism in a Sample of Arrestees Violence Against Women, October 1, 2006; 12(10): 917 - 935. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. W. Pearson and L. W. Sherman The Achievements, Frustrations, and Promise of the Social Sciences The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, July 1, 2005; 600(1): 6 - 13. [PDF]

				L. F. Berkman Introduction: Seeing the Forest and the Trees--From Observation to Experiments in Social Epidemiology Epidemiol. Rev., July 1, 2004; 26(1): 2 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]