This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Petrosino, A. Articles by Buehler, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Scared Straight and Other Juvenile Awareness Programs for Preventing Juvenile Delinquency: A Systematic Review of the Randomized Experimental Evidence

Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group

Carolyn Turpin-Petrosino

Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice at Bridgewater State College in Massachusetts

John Buehler

Harvard University Department of Statistics

Scared Straight and other programs involve organized visits to prison facilities by juvenile delinquents or at-risk kids to deter them from delinquency. Despite several research studies and reviews questioning their effectiveness, they remain in use and have now been tried in at least six nations. The authors report here on the results of a systematic review of randomized experimental tests of this program. Studies that tested any program involving the organized visits of delinquents or at-risk children to penal institutions were included. Each study had to have a no-treatment control condition with at least one outcome measure of "postvisit" criminal behavior. Using extensive search methods, the authors located nine randomized trials meeting eligibility criteria. After describing the studies and appraising their methodological quality, the authors present the narrative findings from each evaluation. A meta-analysis of prevalence rates indicates that the intervention on average is more harmful to juveniles than doing nothing. The authors conclude that governments should institute rigorous programs of research to ensure that well-intentioned treatments do not cause harm to the citizens they pledge to protect.

Key Words: Scared Straight • juvenile awareness • delinquency prevention • meta-analysis • randomized experiments

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 589, No. 1, 41-62 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716203254693


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Perelman and C. B. Clements Beliefs About What Works in Juvenile Rehabilitation: The Influence of Attitudes on Support for "Get Tough" and Evidence-Based Interventions Criminal Justice and Behavior, February 1, 2009; 36(2): 184 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Scott An update on interventions for conduct disorder Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 61 - 70. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Gambrill Evidence-Based Practice and Policy: Choices Ahead Research on Social Work Practice, May 1, 2006; 16(3): 338 - 357. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. O. Windell and J. S. Allen Jr. An Application of Fear Appeal Messages to Enhance the Benefits of a Jail Encounter Program for Youthful Offenders Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, October 1, 2005; 3(4): 388 - 394. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. D. Borman, R. E. Slavin, A. Cheung, A. M. Chamberlain, N. A. Madden, and B. Chambers Success for All: First-Year Results From the National Randomized Field Trial Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 2005; 27(1): 1 - 22. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. W. Sherman and H. Strang Verdicts or Inventions?: Interpreting Results from Randomized Controlled Experiments in Criminology American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 2004; 47(5): 575 - 607. [Abstract] [PDF]