Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, B. C.
Right arrow Articles by Farrington, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Closed-Circuit Television on Crime

Brandon C. Welsh

Department of Criminal Justice, University of Massachusetts, Lowell

David P. Farrington

Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge

This article reports on the findings of a systematic review--incorporating meta-analytic techniques--of the available research evidence on the effects of closed-circuit television (CCTV) on crime in public space. A number of targeted and comprehensive searches of the published and unpublished literature and contacts with leading researchers produced twenty-two CCTV evaluations that met our criteria for inclusion in this review. CCTV had a significant desirable effect on crime, although the overall reduction in crime was a rather small 4 percent. All nine studies showing evidence of a desirable effect of CCTV on crime were carried out in the United Kingdom. Conversely, the other nine studies showing no evidence of any desirable effect of CCTV on crime included all five North American studies. CCTV was most effective in reducing crime in car parks. It had no effect on violent crimes but had a significant desirable effect on vehicle crimes.

Key Words: closed-circuit television • situational crime prevention • surveillance • systematic review • meta-analysis

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 587, No. 1, 110-135 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716202250802
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eval RevHome page
D. F. Greenberg and J. B. Roush
The Effectiveness of an Electronic Security Management System in a Privately Owned Apartment Complex
Eval Rev, February 1, 2009; 33(1): 3 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
T. J. L. van Rompay, D. J. Vonk, and M. L. Fransen
The Eye of the Camera: Effects of Security Cameras on Prosocial Behavior
Environment and Behavior, January 1, 2009; 41(1): 60 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
O. Coutard and S. Guy
STS and the City: Politics and Practices of Hope
Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2007; 32(6): 713 - 734.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal JusticeHome page
N. Tilley
Applying theory-driven evaluation to the British Crime Reduction Programme: The theories of the programme and of its evaluations
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, August 1, 2004; 4(3): 255 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
D. P. Farrington
Methodological Quality Standards for Evaluation Research
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2003; 587(1): 49 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]