Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to view The AAPSS Blog

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deil-Amen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenbaum, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Social Prerequisites of Success: Can College Structure Reduce the Need for Social Know-How?

Regina Deil-Amen

James E. Rosenbaum

A study of fourteen colleges finds that community colleges require certain kinds of social know-how—skills and knowledge less available to disadvantaged students. They present seven obstacles: (1) bureaucratic hurdles, (2) confusing choices, (3) student-initiated guidance, (4) limited counselor availability, (5) poor advice from staff, (6) delayed detection of costly mistakes, and (7) poor handling of conflicting demands. However, we find that a very different kind of college—the private occupational college—takes steps to structure out the need for this social know-how and address the needs of disadvantaged students. We speculate about possible policy implications.

Key Words: community colleges • proprietary • cultural capital • higher education • college students • dropout

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 586, No. 1, 120-143 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716202250216
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
F. T. Pfeffer
Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment and its Institutional Context
Eur. Sociol. Rev., December 1, 2008; 24(5): 543 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
J. Roksa and B. Keith
Credits, Time, and Attainment: Articulation Policies and Success After Transfer
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, September 1, 2008; 30(3): 236 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Community College ReviewHome page
P. Schuetz and P. Schuetz
UCLA Community College Review: Campus Environment: A Missing Link in Studies of Community College Attrition
Community College Review, March 1, 2005; 32(4): 60 - 80.
[PDF]

Home page
 The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
S. Brint
Few Remaining Dreams: Community Colleges Since 1985
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, March 1, 2003; 586(1): 16 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]