This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mooney, C. Z. Articles by Lee, M.-H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Morality Policy Reinvention: State Death Penalties

University of Illinois at Springfield

Mei-Hsien Lee

National Chi Nan University, Taiwan

How does morality policy change as it diffuses? Social learning theory holds that later adopters learn from earlier adoptions to modify, or reinvent, a policy to fit their needs better. But because of its technical simplicity, saliency, and conflicts of basic values, morality policy may not be amenable to policy learning. We develop and test three reinvention hypotheses reflecting distinct roles for learning. Our analysis of U.S. state death penalty policy supports each hypothesis but under different political conditions. We conclude that, when possible, policymakers make morality policy in their usual way, by incremental steps and learning from previous adoptions. But when basic moral conflicts surface, considerations other than policy learning drive reinvention.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 566, No. 1, 80-92 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/000271629956600107


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. I. McClelland and M. Fine Embedded Science: Critical Analysis of Abstinence-Only Evaluation Research Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 50 - 81. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Arsneault Values and Virtue: The Politics of Abstinence-Only Sex Education The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2001; 31(4): 436 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF]