The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BAZEMORE, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 564, No. 1, 81-108 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716299564001006

The Fork in the Road to Juvenile Court Reform

GORDON BAZEMORE

Juvenile justice reform efforts seeking a more criminalized juvenile court and justice system, as well as those aimed at revitalizing the individual treatment mission, have been one-dimensional in their failure to address the multiple justice needs of communities associated with youth crime, and they have been insular in their singular focus on the needs and risks of offenders. In the late 1990s, a growing number of juvenile justice professionals began to embrace a third, more holistic vision for reform based on a normative concern with repairing the harm caused by crime to individuals and relationships and a commitment to victims, communities, and offenders as primary stakeholders in the justice process. This article considers the implications of emerging practice based on a restorative community justice model for systemic reform in the context, content, and structure of juvenile justice and the response to youth crime.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
H.-E. Sung and S. Belenko
From Diversion Experiment to Policy Movement: A Case Study of Prosecutorial Innovation
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, August 1, 2006; 22(3): 220 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
G. Bazemore and C. Erbe
Operationalizing the Community Variable in Offender Reintegration:: Theory and Practice for Developing Intervention Social Capital
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, July 1, 2003; 1(3): 246 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Youth SocietyHome page
G. BAZEMORE
Young People, Trouble, and Crime: Restorative Justice as a Normative Theory of Informal Social Control and Social Support
Youth Society, December 1, 2001; 33(2): 199 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice ReviewHome page
J. T. Whitehead and M. C. Braswell
The Future of Probation: Reintroducing the Spitual Dimension into Correctional Practice
Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2000; 25(2): 207 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]