|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Working to Place Family at the Center of Life: Dual-Earner and Single-Parent Strategies
Rosanna Hertz
Wellesley College
There are two basic types of work-family strategies: workplace-based strategies and family-centered strategies. In the past, attention has been placed mostly on work policies. This article focuses on members of dual-earner and single-parent families who have actively placed family at the center of their lives. The strategies they adopt depend upon their position in the labor market as well as marital status. Some dual-earner families jointly calculate scheduling and job trajectories while utilizing benefits from both of their employees; others reluctantly coparent because of underemployment. Single mothers who have professional or technical skills try to make special accommodations with bosses or they become contract workers, while less skilled single mothers need benefits in order not to have to work several jobs. In addition, some single mothers have developed extensive networks and advocate for more community support of child rearing. Most working parents committed to keeping their families at the center have pursued nontraditional career paths. Ideologies about families and parenting may shape strategies about employment more often than workplace norms or work-family policies.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 562, No. 1,
16-31 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/000271629956200102

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Perrone, S. L. Wright, and Z. V. Jackson
Traditional and Nontraditional Gender Roles and Work--Family Interface for Men and Women
Journal of Career Development,
September 1, 2009;
36(1):
8 - 24.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Ezzedeen and K. G. Ritchey
The Man Behind the Woman: A Qualitative Study of the Spousal Support Received and Valued by Executive Women
Journal of Family Issues,
September 1, 2008;
29(9):
1107 - 1135.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Gordon and K. S. Whelan-Berry
Contributions to Family and Household Activities by the Husbands of Midlife Professional Women
Journal of Family Issues,
October 1, 2005;
26(7):
899 - 923.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. McCurdy, M. A. Newman, and N. P. Lovrich
Family-Friendly Workplace Policy Adoption in General and Special Purpose Local Governments: Learning From the Washington State Experience
Review of Public Personnel Administration,
March 1, 2002;
22(1):
27 - 51.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. VOYDANOFF
Linkages Between the Work-family Interface and Work, Family, and Individual Outcomes: An Integrative Model
Journal of Family Issues,
January 1, 2002;
23(1):
138 - 164.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Newman and K. Mathews
Federal Family-Friendly Workplace Policies: Barriers to Effective Implementation
Review of Public Personnel Administration,
July 1, 1999;
19(3):
34 - 48.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|