Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to watch the video

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FREUDENBURG, W. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Risky Thinking: Irrational Fears about Risk and Society

WILLIAM R. FREUDENBURG

Scientists have made remarkable progress in dealing with technical challenges but not in dealing with society. Given that public concerns have grown, in the face of declining "real" risks, the common if simplistic tendency has been to blame public ignorance or irrationality and to argue that policy decisions should be based on quantitative risk estimates, effectively ignoring public concerns. Such assertions are superficially plausible, but they reflect fundamental misunderstandings of the nature of technological societies, as well as of the reasons behind declining scientific credibility and of actual strengths and weaknesses of risk assessment. Scientific credibility has been undermined not so much by shadowy enemies as by actions of self-proclaimed friends, and there are inherent limitations to the practical usefulness of risk assessment in policy disputes. If proposals for risk-based decision making were actually implemented, they could well lead not to increased credibility for specific technologies but to self-reinforcing losses of credibility for science and technology as a whole.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 545, No. 1, 44-53 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716296545001005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Bulletin of Science Technology SocietyHome page
Z. Meghani and I. de Melo-Martin
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Evaluation of the Safety of Animal Clones: A Failure to Recognize the Normativity of Risk Assessment Projects
Bulletin of Science Technology Society, February 1, 2009; 29(1): 9 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization EnvironmentHome page
D. J. Davidson and S. Frickel
Understanding Environmental Governance: A Critical Review
Organization Environment, December 1, 2004; 17(4): 471 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
K. Sprecker
How Involvement, Citation Style, and Funding Source Affect the Credibility of University Scientists
Science Communication, September 1, 2002; 24(1): 72 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
H. Tsoukas
David and Goliath in the Risk Society: Making Sense of the Conflict between Shell and Greenpeace in the North Sea
Organization, August 1, 1999; 6(3): 499 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]