This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by POLLAK, R. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Government Risk Regulation

This article argues that risk assessment, supposedly the scientific component of risk regulation (as opposed to risk management, the policy component), cannot be very scientific because too little is known. Without firm scientific knowledge, risk assessment must rely on conventions promulgated by bureaucrats or on the professional judgments of scientific experts; such conventions and judgments reflect not only scientific knowledge but also policy judgments and cultural values. The inadequacy of scientific knowledge, coupled with the lack of public trust in government and in experts, suggests that risk regulators should be concerned not only with creating institutional arrangements likely to foster trust but also with creating mechanisms for providing concerned individuals with credible reassurance. The article concludes by discussing divergences between public perceptions and expert perceptions of risks, and the weights that a democratic society should give to each in assessing and managing risks.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 545, No. 1, 25-34 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716296545001003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Basolo, L. J. Steinberg, R. J. Burby, J. Levine, A. M. Cruz, and C. Huang The Effects of Confidence in Government and Information on Perceived and Actual Preparedness for Disasters Environment and Behavior, May 1, 2009; 41(3): 338 - 364. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Rowe and L. J. Frewer Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2000; 25(1): 3 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]