This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by SCHEINGOLD, S. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Politics, Public Policy, and Street Crime

For more than two decades, the United States has been at war with street crime, but we have precious little to show for it. Our obsession with punishment at the expense of, indeed to the exclusion of, prevention is not just futile but criminogenic and divisive. This article explains what is problematic about our indiscriminately punitive response to street crime and explores the political forces driving these self-defeating policies. What emerges is an understanding of the politics of street crime that is rooted less in the fear of crime than in a variety of anxieties that transcend street crime but are affectively related to it. Criminals provide a convenient target for the anger that is widely felt, but is not quite appropriate to express, with respect to unwelcome changes in race relations, employment opportunities, homelessness, and the like. To serve their own distinct but convergent purposes, the media, the public, and the politicians all contribute to the perpetuation of our perverse approach to controlling street crime. While there are countervailing forces at work, they seem unlikely to prevail in the foreseeable future.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 539, No. 1, 155-168 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716295539001012


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Johnson Anger about crime and support for punitive criminal justice policies Punishment Society, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 51 - 66. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. C. Gray and A. T. Salole The Local Culture of Punishment: An Ethnography of Criminal Justice Worker Discourse Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2006; 46(4): 661 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. E. Zimring and D. T. Johnson Public Opinion and the Governance of Punishment in Democratic Political Systems The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 2006; 605(1): 265 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. Oliver and D. E. Barlow Following the Leader? Presidential Influence Over Congress in the Passage of Federal Crime Control Policy Criminal Justice Policy Review, September 1, 2005; 16(3): 267 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. Oliver The Power to Persuade: Presidential Influence Over Congress on Crime Control Policy Criminal Justice Review, May 1, 2003; 28(1): 113 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. M. Oliver The Pied Piper of Crime in America: An Analysis of the Presidents' and Public's Agenda on Crime Criminal Justice Policy Review, June 1, 2002; 13(2): 139 - 155. [Abstract] [PDF]