Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to view The AAPSS Blog

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ROCHON, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by MAZMANIAN, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Social Movements and the Policy Process

THOMAS R. ROCHON

DANIEL A. MAZMANIAN

Social movements frequently fail to achieve the policy changes they seek, despite impressive demonstrations of widespread support. Yet movement participation has become increasingly popular as a form of political action. The authors seek to resolve this dilemma by distinguishing between three arenas of movement success: changing policy, gaining participation in the policy process, and changing social values. It is suggested that gaining access to the policy process is the most effective path for movement organizations to have an impact on policy outcomes, because authorities are often more willing to offer inclusion in the process than they are to accept movement demands for policy change. The authors' hypotheses are examined in light of the experience of the nuclear freeze movement, which sought and failed to achieve policy change, and the movement to control hazardous wastes, in which environmentalists are having an impact on policy by gaining participation in regulatory and implementation decisions.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 528, No. 1, 75-87 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716293528001006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
C. Koski and P. J. May
Interests and Implementation: Fostering Voluntary Regulatory Actions
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2006; 16(3): 329 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
K. J. O'Brien and L. Li
Popular Contention and its Impact in Rural China
Comparative Political Studies, April 1, 2005; 38(3): 235 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Political Research QuarterlyHome page
D. M. Stetson and A. G. Mazur
Women's Movements and the State: Job-Training Policy in France and the U.S.
Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2000; 53(3): 597 - 623.
[Abstract] [PDF]