This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by KITSCHELT, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Social Movements, Political Parties, and Democratic Theory

New left-libertarian social movements invoke an ancient communitarian democratic theory against the contemporary practice of competitive elite democracy. Two explanations for this phenomenon are explored. First, in a cyclical model, challenges to representative democracy are viewed as recurring expressions of dissatisfaction with representative institutions. Second, in a structural differentiation model, the practices of left-libertarian movements trigger a pluralization of political decision modes in advanced capitalist democracies, even if such participatory innovations fall short of the direct democratic ideal expressed by movement activists. Although the cyclical model has some merit, on the whole, the structural differentiation model provides an analytically more powerful explanation of recent social movement activity.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 528, No. 1, 13-29 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716293528001002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Nevitte and M. Kanji Orientations Towards Authority and Congruency Theory: The Cross-national, Cross-time Evidence International Journal of Comparative Sociology, March 1, 1999; 40(1): 161 - 190. [Abstract] [PDF]