Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to view The AAPSS Blog

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHLEGEL, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Crime in the Pits: The Regulation of Futures Trading

KIP SCHLEGEL

In the late 1980s, the Federal Bureau of Investigation initiated an extensive undercover investigation of trading abuses in the two largest futures exchanges in the United States. Though the investigation received widespread media attention, the nature and significance of the crimes involved remain unclear to many people, largely because of the complexity of futures trading itself. This article describes the organization and operation of futures markets and provides an account of the offenses targeted by the investigation. Two structural components of futures trading, dual trading and the openoutcry system, criticized as offering ripe opportunities for abuse, are examined in detail. Finally, efforts at reform can be understood only when set within the context of organizational forces and pressures acting on the futures exchanges and the agencies responsible for regulation. In particular, the changing world market and competition for regulatory jurisdiction are offered as guides for understanding reform efforts.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 525, No. 1, 59-70 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716293525001005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?