Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to watch the video

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KLEIMAN, M. A. R.
Right arrow Articles by CAULKINS, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Heroin Policy for the Next Decade

MARK A. R. KLEIMAN

JONATHAN P. CAULKINS

The supply of heroin in the United States appears to have grown substantially in recent years, although it is not clear what impact this has had on consumption. Conventional indicators have shown only modest increases, but for a variety of reasons one would not expect increases even if we are in the early years of a new heroin use epidemic. It is even less clear what, if anything, should be done. Drug control resources are finite. Making heroin a new policy focus may impose substantial opportunity costs as resources are diverted from other worthy programs. On the other hand, the history of cocaine in the late 1970s and early 1980s demonstrates that "wait and see" can be an extremely expensive option. A prudent course may be to implement relatively low-cost interventions that one would not regret undertaking even if a new epidemic never materialized and to enhance monitoring. If these enhanced monitoring programs gave strong signs of increasing use, particularly by new users, bolder interventions might be warranted.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 521, No. 1, 163-174 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716292521001010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?