Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to watch the video

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BACHMAN, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by CLARK, J. L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Measurement of Foreign/Second Language Proficiency

LYLE F. BACHMAN

JOHN L. D. CLARK

Based on and synthesizing recent advances in both psychometric procedures and communicatively oriented linguistic analysis, a theoretical framework for describing factors affecting performance on foreign/second language tests is presented. Included within this framework are both test method factors—such as the testing environment, the nature of the instructions to the examinee, and the stimulus and response modalities represented in the test—and linguistic factors, including the examinee's organizational and pragmatic competence, strategic competence, and psychophysiological skills involved in the proper reception or production of the test language. Implications of the framework for the development and validation of communicative language proficiency tests are discussed and an action plan is suggested, including further refinement of the theoretical framework; development of large-scale, highly authentic criterion measures operationalizing each of the framework factors; and subsequent validation of both existing and to-be-developed practically oriented communicative proficiency tests against the criterion measures. Establishment of a working group of interested individuals from several institutions and disciplinary areas is proposed as an appropriate administrative vehicle for these activities.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 490, No. 1, 20-33 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716287490001003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Language TestingHome page
J. W. Oller Jr., K. Kim, and Y. Choe
Applying general sign theory to testing language (verbal) and nonverbal abilities
Language Testing, October 1, 2000; 17(4): 377 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
J. W. Oller Jr., K. Kim, and Y. Choe
Testing verbal (language) and non-verbal abilities in language minorities: a socio-educational problem in historical perspective
Language Testing, July 1, 2000; 17(3): 341 - 360.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
M. Chalhoub-Deville
Theoretical models, assessment frameworks and test construction
Language Testing, March 1, 1997; 14(1): 3 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
L. F. Bachman, A. Kunnan Swathi Vanniaraian, and B. Lynch
Task and ability analysis as a basis for examining content and construct comparability in two EFL proficiency test batteries
Language Testing, December 1, 1988; 5(2): 128 - 159.
[Abstract] [PDF]