This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by STEADMAN, H. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Empirical Research on the Insanity Defense

In contrast to the jurisprudential history of the insanity defense, significant empirical research on its use and effects has emerged only in the past decade. The research is organized here around six major questions closely related to the public policy questions that have gained much currency in the wake of the John Hinckley trial. In many instances, the research data sharply conflict with popular notions of who are acquitted by reason of insanity and how long they are hospitalized after acquittal. There is considerable consistency across jurisdictions on the characteristics of acquittees and their recidivism rates, but substantial differences on the length of their detention both across jurisdictions and in different time periods within jurisdictions. Future research, to be productive for both policy and substantive purposes, requires multistate designs with a systemic approach.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 477, No. 1, 58-71 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716285477001006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. G. Gutheil A Confusion of Tongues: Competence, Insanity, Psychiatry, and the Law Psychiatr Serv, June 1, 1999; 50(6): 767 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. STEADMAN and J. P. MORRISSEY The Insanity Defense: Problems and Prospects for Studying the Impact of Legal Reforms The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, March 1, 1986; 484(1): 115 - 126. [Abstract]