Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to watch the video

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SCHEINMAN, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Refugees: Goodbye to the Good Old Days

RONALD S. SCHEINMAN

The era of relative simplicity in refugee affairs has ended. Legal challenges, economic difficulties in the industrialized democracies, and the inability of some countries of first asylum to allow refugees to remain in their territories have contributed to a sense of crisis. This has come about because of confusion between refugees and economic migrants and a perception that greater numbers of people are on the move, in more uncontrollable ways, than ever before. Finally, economic and employment problems, which are themselves cyclical, lead to protectionist measures that can become fixed in law. To keep our commitments to genuine refugees and the system of protection and assistance that has evolved over 60 years of international cooperation, two things are needed. The first is to maintain the integrity of the definition of a refugee as it exists in international treaty and U.S. statute. The tendency to wish to extend those privileges to all unfortunate people is understandable, but will surely erode the special status reserved to victims of persecution. The second is to design joint resettlement and development projects that can benefit a broader class of displaced persons. This will relieve population pressures on first-asylum countries; avoid eligibility determinations that sometimes result in stark life-and-death choices; and, by helping development, also contribute to ameliorating some of the root causes of forced migration.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 467, No. 1, 78-88 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716283467001006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?