Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to view The AAPSS Blog

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEIBOWITZ, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Refugee Act of 1980: Problems and Congressional Concerns

ARNOLD H. LEIBOWITZ

The Refugee Act of 1980 was the most comprehensive U.S. law ever enacted concerning refugee admissions and resettlement. But each one of its principles has raised problems and encouraged new debate with respect to its implementation or its continuance. Levels of refugee flow are clearly a concern in Congress, linked in the eyes of many with broader issues of border control, fiscal policy, and the appropriate role of the legislative branch. Further attempts to limit that flow through some sort of numerical cap can be expected, as well as further debate on the reach of the refugee definition. Closely associated with the issue of flow and the validity of particular claims is the asylum issue. The right of asylum, having been incorporated into domestic law, will not be abolished. However, concern over numbers, over the inefficiency of present procedures, and over their hotly debated fairness or political bias is certain to generate renewed effort to reform asylum adjudication procedures. Finally, the method and financing of resettlement assistance to refugees is likely to remain the subject of debate. Divorcing refugee assistance from refugee admissions will continue to be discussed. Congressional battles will also be waged over appropriate levels of funding for refugee programs and quite possibly over the design of those programs, especially as it affects their coordination with state and local governments, the role of the private voluntary agencies, and the mutual assistance agencies.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 467, No. 1, 163-171 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716283467001012


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C. Hardy, N. Phillips, and S. Clegg
Reflexivity in Organization and Management Theory: A Study of the Production of the Research `Subject'
Human Relations, May 1, 2001; 54(5): 531 - 560.
[Abstract] [PDF]