Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to watch the video

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LITTLE, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Multinational Corporations and Foreign Investment: Current Trends and Issues

JANE SNEDDON LITTLE

Surely multinational corporations (MNCs) symbolize the internationalization of America for the U.S. public. The United States is the world's leading home and host country for these global firms. However, while our MNCs have considerable weight in some foreign countries, by most measures, foreign-owned businesses do not loom very large in the U.S. economy. Although the free flow of foreign direct investment promotes economic efficiency and world welfare, from a national viewpoint MNCs appear threatening. In particular, the U.S. public is concerned that our MNCs export U.S. jobs and that foreign MNCs can use U.S. resources to undercut our national goals. These fears are largely unfounded. On the whole, the traditional U.S. "open door" to foreign investment has served this country well. Nevertheless, many foreign governments are now trying to channel foreign investment flows to maximize their own national advantage. To protect our interests, the U.S. government is being urged to adopt similar regulations. The United States has no need for such measures; however, U.S. and world interests would be well served by an international agreement limiting efforts to distort foreign investment decisions. Because U.S. investment flows are huge by world standards but have a relatively small impact on our own economy, the United States has a unique ability to help form an international consensus on acceptable foreign investment policies.

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 460, No. 1, 54-63 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/0002716282460001007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
K.-T. Liou
Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Trends, Motives, and the State Experience
The American Review of Public Administration, March 1, 1993; 23(1): 1 - 17.
[Abstract]